Write a one-paragraph letter to the editor of a newspaper from the perspective of a Federalist supporting ratification of the Constitution. Also write a one-paragraph letter to the editor opposing ratification as an Anti-Federalist. I support ratification because ... Start typing here... I do not support ratification because...
I believe that the Constitution would create a national government that was strong enough to unite the quarreling states into a single republic. I would also live to recall that there are weaknesses in the government under the Articles of Confederation. Therefore, the Constitution would solve those problems by creating a stronger, more effective union of the states. Furthermore, the strong government would also take away American’s rights. The power that would be brought to the government were strictly limited, meaning that the government would threatened American’s freedom. To conclude, supporting the ratification of the Constitution would be beneficial for all Americans and the government.
I would like to inform my Ratification of the Constitution on my perspective of the Federalists. The Federalists happened to make an argument on that the Constitution would create a strong National Government. Also, the Federalists wanted someone who was able to support a strong Central Government. The Federalist's were able to recall the weaknesses of the Government under the Articles of Confederation. In Conclusion, The Federalists want someone who is determined and set good standards.
Anti-Federalists
Dear Editor,
I would like to inform my Ratification of the Constitution on my perspective of the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists are "against" a strong Central Government(Aniti New Constitution). Anti-Federalists are afraid the National Government would become to powerful. Lastly, The Anti-Federalists want a Bill of Rights to be added to protect individual rights. In Conclusion, The Anti-Federalist are against following examples of the National Government because they want everything for "every-man-for-himself."
