Respuesta :
Answer: A.) It connects the authorâs imagined scenario to his claim about the Athenians.
Explanation: To understand the rhetorical function of this sentence, it is important to consider how the authorâs imaginary scenario fits into his broader line of reasoning. In the fourth paragraph, the author brings up âthe Greeks,â anticipating that his audience will mention them to refute his claim that âthere never has been an artistic age, or an artistic people.â This implies that his audience believes that ancient Athens was more hospitable to artists than their own nineteenth-century society is. Then, in the eighth and ninth paragraphs, the author responds to this anticipated objection by describing the hypothetical persecution of a contemporary English artist. By revealing that the imagined events really happened to Phidias in supposedly âartisticâ Athens, the final sentence shows that the imaginary scenario supports the authorâs earlier claim that the Athenians were not an artistic people (âWere they . . . do neitherâ). The authorâs conclusion thus brings his argument to a unified end, simultaneously wrapping up his discussion of the Athenians and refuting the main objection to his overarching claim about how artists fit into their societies.
Answer:
Y'all it's A. It connects the authorâs imagined scenario to his claim about the Athenians.
Explanation:
Right on a p classroom